/* * Mathematical model of human growth hormone (hGH)-stimulated * cell proliferation explains the efficacy of hGH variants as * receptor agonists or antagonists * * Model Status * * This CellML model runs in OpenCell (but not COR due to the presence * of differential algebraic equations). The units have been checked * and they are consistent. The CellML model may recreate the results * of the original published model but there is no simple validation * method as there are no "concentration against time" figures * in the paper. The CellML model is based on equations A2-A5 from * the Appendix (steady state model). Parameter values were taken * from table 1 in the paper and were also supplied through correspondence * with the original model author. * * Model Structure * * ABSTRACT: Human growth hormone (hGH) is a therapeutically important * endocrine factor that signals various cell types. Structurally * and functionally, the interactions of hGH with its receptor * have been resolved in fine detail, such that hGH and hGH receptor * variants can be practically engineered by either random or rational * approaches to achieve significant changes in the free energies * of binding. A somewhat unique feature of hGH action is its homodimerization * of two hGH receptors, which is required for intracellular signaling * and stimulation of cell proliferation, yet the potencies of * hGH mutants in cell-based assays rarely correlate with their * overall receptor-binding avidities. Here, a mathematical model * of hGH-stimulated cell signaling is posed, accounting not only * for binding interactions at the cell surface but induction of * receptor endocytosis and downregulation as well. Receptor internalization * affects ligand potency by imposing a limit on the lifetime of * an active receptor complex, irrespective of ligand-receptor * binding properties. The model thus explains, in quantitative * terms, the numerous published observations regarding hGH receptor * agonism and antagonism and challenges the interpretations of * previous studies that have not considered receptor trafficking * as a central regulatory mechanism in hGH signaling. * * model diagram * * [[Image file: haugh_2004.png]] * * A schematic diagram of the kinetic model of human growth hormone * (hGH) receptor binding and trafficking. The extracellular ligand * (L), hGH, has two sites for binding the hGH receptor (R), and * these are shown in cerise and cyan in the diagram and are numbered * 1 and 2 respectively. Site 1 always binds to the receptor first * to form a 1:1 ligand-receptor complex (C). A 1:2 dimer (D) may * then form through the binding of a second receptor to site 2 * of the ligand. Dimer dissociation can occur the uncoupling of * either hGH site 1 or site 2, but the 1:1 ligand-receptor complexes * bound through site 2 dissociate much faster than those bound * through site 1. Dimerised complexes (D) are internalised at * a higher rate than are free receptors (R) or 1:1 complexes (C), * and while internalised dimers are always degraded, internalised * 1:1 complexes or free receptors can either be degraded or recycled * to the cell surface. A steady state is maintained through de * novo receptor synthesis. * * The original paper reference is cited below: * * Mathematical model of human growth hormone (hGH)-stimulated * cell proliferation explains the efficacy of hGH variants as * receptor agonists or antagonists, Jason M. Haugh, 2004, Biotechnology * Progress, volume 20, issue 5, 1337-1344. PubMed ID: 15458315 */ import nsrunit; unit conversion on; // unit nanomolar predefined unit per_nanomolar=1E6 meter^3*mole^(-1); unit minute=60 second^1; unit flux=1.6666667E-8 meter^(-3)*second^(-1)*mole^1; unit first_order_rate_constant=.01666667 second^(-1); unit second_order_rate_constant=1.6666667E4 meter^3*second^(-1)*mole^(-1); math main { realDomain time minute; time.min=0; extern time.max; extern time.delta; real C nanomolar; real kf1 second_order_rate_constant; kf1=0.1; real kr1 first_order_rate_constant; real k_x1 first_order_rate_constant; real kt first_order_rate_constant; kt=0.005; real ke first_order_rate_constant; ke=0.10; real L nanomolar; L=0.01; real R nanomolar; real K_X per_nanomolar; real D nanomolar; real kx2 second_order_rate_constant; kx2=4.83; real k_x2 first_order_rate_constant; k_x2=0.016; real R_initial nanomolar; R_initial=2000.0; real krec first_order_rate_constant; krec=0.0; real kdeg first_order_rate_constant; kdeg=0.05; real Ri(time) nanomolar; when(time=time.min) Ri=200.0; real signal dimensionless; real kappaE dimensionless; kappaE=0.20; real Vs flux; Vs=10.0; real KD nanomolar; KD=1.0; // // C=(kf1*L*R/(kr1+kt+(k_x1+ke)*K_X*R)); // D=(K_X*R*C); K_X=(kx2/(k_x2+k_x1+ke)); // R=(R_initial-(C+2*(ke/kt)*(1+krec/kdeg)*D)); // Ri:time=(kt*(R+C)-(krec+kdeg)*Ri); // signal=(2*D/(200 nanomolar)/(kappaE+2*D/(200 nanomolar))); // kr1=(KD*kf1); k_x1=(.01*kr1); }